Institutional Logics and Institutional Pluralism : The Contestation of Care and

We are grateful for the many scholars and medical practitioners who helped with our research. We thank the editor, Mauro Guillén, three anonymous reviewers who helped to substantially improve the paper, the participants of the EGOS 2007 Subtheme on Professions, the Boston College Research Workshop 2008, and the following people who provided helpful comments on prior drafts of our paper: Forrest Briscoe, Marta Elvira, MaryAnn Glynn, Beth Goodrick, Amit Nigam, Siobhán O’Mahony, Mike Lounsbury, Mike Pratt, Trish Reay, Sara Rynes, and Cheryl McCartney, professor of psychiatry, former executive associate dean for medical education at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine and site visitor for the Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Andy Henderson and Emilio Castilla provided valuable help with research methods. We are grateful to the Management Department and Herb Kelleher Center at the McCombs School of Business for fi nancial support for this work. We thank Kevin Partida for his assistance collecting, scanning, and cleaning annual reports of medical education in the Journal of the American Medical Association. We also thank Felipe Gorenstein Massa and Kristin Carpasso for their research assistance on coding managed care discourse in the New York Times. The authors contributed equally to this work. Institutional Logics and Institutional Pluralism: The Contestation of Care and Science Logics in Medical Education, 1967–2005